We
are about to finish the holidays ;( a time for others full of joy,
laughter, play, sea, sand and a lot of sun ... more than I like ha ha
ha .... my little girl, this year as always we get warmed up to face a
new course, full of challenge and of course learning....
Friday, 31 August 2018
Tuesday, 28 August 2018
Doping
When I think of any
sport that is practiced on
a
professional level, I consider that it's one of the best ways to be
self-disciplined, to learn to work in a team, to learn to give your
best effort (people always want to break their limits), to learn
that winning is more than being the first; it's understanding that
it's part of a hard work process, that losing doesn't mean being the
worst or the last, but it could be the golden opportunity that
teaches you to see your mistakes as part of your training and/or
growth.
However, when
an elite athlete reaches his peak of performance and savours the
pleasure of being recognized and admired in his discipline, he could
be tempted to make this performance something continuous and / or
permanent. Or conversely, if an elite athlete, despite
what he does, doesn't reach a high
level of performance, he could also resort to substances that
stimulate and improve his performance.
In both cases,
I think the problem lies in the fact that not all elite athletes
are tolerant of frustration; considering this type of behavior is
feedback from when we are toddlers. Obviously, we all like to win and
we enjoy it a lot when we are the winners, because since we are kids,
competitiveness is encouraged more than cooperation. Up to a point
it's good that we all have the motivation to win, but not at any
price. Not everything can go in order to be the first and/or the
winner; or not everything should be allowed.
This idea would
theoretically be the ideal, but in reality we see in the press that
there are many cases of doping in the sports world. On the one hand,
I think retroactive punishment of an elite athlete who has used
illegal substances, is not ideal, because if you want to modify or
penalize a negative behavior it would be more effective if it is
immediate. But on the other hand, I believe that it's better to
correct an improper act , even if it is extemporaneously: better
late than never.
In this sense,
the message must be clear: doping to win is cheating, and this act
will have a double penalty, at the sports level (suspension of the
practice of said sport) and at a social level (the loss of prestige
from being a winner to being an imposter). The point is that every
person has his own scale of values and priorities.
Consequently, I
believe that it's equally or more important to train elite athletes
in social skills than simply to develop their sporting discipline.
It's so or even more important to learn from error (often losing is
part of winning, losing you gain experience, you can develop new and
different strategies, you strengthen and temper your character), to
understand that as an elite athlete you are fallible, in addition
your career has a date of expiration. Likewise, it would be very
important to develop techniques of physiological deactivation, among
many others, to achieve the full performance of an elite athlete.
I think that if
you invest in all these aspects, it would be more effective than the
simple punishment and /or penalty of an
athlete. And on the other hand, we could break the stigma that falls
on some elite athletes: all brawn and no brain.
Sunday, 5 August 2018
Friday, 3 August 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)